ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Observation (CEACR) - adoptée 2000, publiée 89ème session CIT (2001)

Convention (n° 95) sur la protection du salaire, 1949 - France (Ratification: 1952)

Autre commentaire sur C095

Observation
  1. 2000
  2. 1995
Demande directe
  1. 2012
  2. 2007
  3. 2001
  4. 2000
  5. 1995
Réponses reçues aux questions soulevées dans une demande directe qui ne donnent pas lieu à d’autres commentaires
  1. 2019

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which reads as follows:

The Committee notes the observations presented by the French Democratic Confederation of Labour (CFDT), communicated by the Government with its report. First, the CFDT notes the disparity between the evaluation of benefits in kind (accommodation) fixed by the Labour Code and that established by the social security scales, which, in its submission, is causing difficulties in the presentation of pay slips in certain sectors such as hotels. Secondly, the CFDT considers that the wording of section L.143-2 of the Labour Code, which provides that wages must be paid once a month, is ambiguous since it is not clear whether the term "month" means a calendar month or a one-month period between two dates.

The Committee notes that the Government has provided no information on these observations, which the Committee discusses in a direct request.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer